| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SE Missouri St. IndiansSEMIZ | 56 | +130 W | +2.75 (-110) W | O 138.5 (-110) L U 138.5 (-110) W |
| UT Martin SkyhawksUTM | 53 | -150 L | -2.75 (-110) L |
SE Missouri St. Indians defeated UT Martin Skyhawks 56-53
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | T |
|---|
Scores, recaps and recorded betting results from the five most recent meetings in SportsJaw history.
SportsJaw’s stored game records date back to 2015. The news feed shows up to the five most recent completed meetings.
Recent game recaps, recorded odds and betting results
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SE Missouri St. IndiansSEMIZ | 56 | +130 W | +2.75 (-110) W | O 138.5 (-110) L U 138.5 (-110) W |
| UT Martin SkyhawksUTM | 53 | -150 L | -2.75 (-110) L |
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | T |
|---|
| SEMIZ | 26 | 21 | 9 | 56 |
|---|
| UTM | 16 | 31 | 6 | 53 |
|---|
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UT Martin SkyhawksUTM | 50 | +122 L | +2.5 (-110) L | O 140.5 (-110) L U 140.5 (-110) W |
| SE Missouri St. IndiansSEMIZ | 66 | -145 W | -2.5 (-110) W |
| Team | 1 | 2 | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| UTM | 20 | 30 | 50 |
| SEMIZ | 40 | 26 | 66 |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UT Martin SkyhawksUTM | 79 | +136 L | +3 (-110) L | O 142 (-110) W U 142 (-110) L |
| SE Missouri St. IndiansSEMIZ | 90 | -159 W | -3 (-110) W |
| Team | 1 | 2 | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| UTM | 33 | 46 | 79 |
| SEMIZ | 46 | 44 | 90 |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SE Missouri St. IndiansSEMIZ | 63 | +120 L | +2.5 (-110) L | O 142 (-110) L U 142 (-110) W |
| UT Martin SkyhawksUTM | 66 | -143 W | -2.5 (-110) W |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UT Martin SkyhawksUTM | 82 | -315 W | -7 (-110) W | O 155.5 (-110) L U 155.5 (-110) W |
| SE Missouri St. IndiansSEMIZ | 72 | +260 L | +7 (-110) L |
Weighted grade based on 75% profit from head-to-head bets and 25% from profits earned betting on either team.
CoversWeighted grade50+$263 · 7 picks5–2 W–L · 71.4%2
CoolioWeighted grade48+$106 · 12 picks7–5 W–L · 58.3%3
BrycetWeighted grade28+$909 · 1 picks1–0 W–L · 100.0%
JoeyBerg1–0 W–L · 100.0%28+$4555
Dtownsend1–0 W–L · 100.0%25+$9096
Captainobvious2–0 W–L · 100.0%22+$2007
Rcollins1–0 W–L · 100.0%19+$4558
Doclocks1–0 W–L · 100.0%18+$2279
Oddsshark6–9 W–L · 40.0%16-$38710
Novacek841–0 W–L · 100.0%15+$45511
MikeVargas1–0 W–L · 100.0%14+$45512
Hustle$1–0 W–L · 100.0%13+$45513
Jtmcentire1–0 W–L · 100.0%13+$45514
Nyg1–1 W–L · 50.0%13-$1015
Tpham1–0 W–L · 100.0%12+$90916
Dpxsports1–0 W–L · 100.0%12+$45517
Mrmister1–1 W–L · 50.0%12+$40918
Kentc_1–0 W–L · 100.0%11+$45519
MauriceJones1–0 W–L · 100.0%10+$9120
Krockpicks1–0 W–L · 100.0%9+$91Expert grades weight verified head-to-head profit at 75% and profit on other games involving either team at 25%, with a confidence adjustment until ten qualifying picks are recorded.