| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louisville CardinalsLOUIS | 88 | -525 W | -9.5 (-110) L | O 162.5 (-110) W U 162.5 (-110) L |
| Wake Forest Demon DeaconsWAKE | 80 | +400 L | +9.5 (-110) W |
Louisville Cardinals defeated Wake Forest Demon Deacons 88-80
| Team | 1 | 2 | T |
|---|
Scores, recaps and recorded betting results from the five most recent meetings in SportsJaw history.
SportsJaw’s stored game records date back to 2015. The news feed shows up to the five most recent completed meetings.
Recent game recaps, recorded odds and betting results
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louisville CardinalsLOUIS | 88 | -525 W | -9.5 (-110) L | O 162.5 (-110) W U 162.5 (-110) L |
| Wake Forest Demon DeaconsWAKE | 80 | +400 L | +9.5 (-110) W |
| Team | 1 | 2 | T |
|---|
| LOUIS | 43 | 45 | 88 |
|---|
| WAKE | 34 | 46 | 80 |
|---|
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wake Forest Demon DeaconsWAKE | 59 | +360 L | +9.5 (-110) L | O 144 (-110) L U 144 (-110) W |
| Louisville CardinalsLOUIS | 72 | -470 W | -9.5 (-110) W |
| Team | 1 | 2 | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| WAKE | 21 | 38 | 59 |
| LOUIS | 45 | 27 | 72 |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louisville CardinalsLOUIS | 65 | +895 L | +16 (-110) L | O 152 (-110) W U 152 (-110) L |
| Wake Forest Demon DeaconsWAKE | 90 | -1600 W | -16 (-110) W |
| Team | 1 | 2 | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| LOUIS | 33 | 32 | 65 |
| WAKE | 48 | 42 | 90 |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wake Forest Demon DeaconsWAKE | 80 | -476 W | -9.5 (-110) L | O 141.5 (-110) W U 141.5 (-110) L |
| Louisville CardinalsLOUIS | 72 | +370 L | +9.5 (-110) W |
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louisville CardinalsLOUIS | 77 | +340 L | +9 (-110) L | O 144 (-110) W U 144 (-110) L |
| Wake Forest Demon DeaconsWAKE | 99 | -460 W | -9 (-110) W |
Weighted grade based on 75% profit from head-to-head bets and 25% from profits earned betting on either team.
OddssharkWeighted grade65+$444 · 9 picks7–2 W–L · 77.8%2
CoolioWeighted grade42+$144 · 6 picks4–2 W–L · 66.7%3
BrycetWeighted grade37+$1,000 · 2 picks2–0 W–L · 100.0%
Dawhiz1–0 W–L · 100.0%32+$9095
Ironcladlocks1–0 W–L · 100.0%29+$2276
Ua20041–0 W–L · 100.0%28+$2277
Covers3–2 W–L · 60.0%23+$828
Georgew1–0 W–L · 100.0%21+$4559
Mikehuff1–0 W–L · 100.0%19+$22710
Amp22231–0 W–L · 100.0%18+$9111
Amp22241–0 W–L · 100.0%13+$9112
JoeThomas1–0 W–L · 100.0%13+$9113
Miamimike0–1 W–L · 0.0%13-$10014
Reeceeddy1–0 W–L · 100.0%11+$10015
13736321570–0 W–L · —11$016
Captainobvious1–1 W–L · 50.0%11-$1017
JoeyBerg0–1 W–L · 0.0%10-$50018
Mookiebets0–1 W–L · 0.0%9-$11019
Destiny090–1 W–L · 0.0%9-$55020That_Dude1–0 W–L · 100.0%8+$100Expert grades weight verified head-to-head profit at 75% and profit on other games involving either team at 25%, with a confidence adjustment until ten qualifying picks are recorded.