SportsJaw
LeaderboardToday's GamesBest BetsConsensus PicksMake Picks
Login / Sign In
Today's GamesLatest PredictionsToday’s Best BetsConsensus PicksTeam PredictionsHead-to-Head MatchupsSJ CoinsAbout SportsJawContact UsLogin / Sign In
HomeMatchupsMake PicksLeaders
SportsJaw

The social platform for sports bettors.

Explore SportsJaw

  • Today’s Picks
  • Predictions
  • Best Bets
  • Leaderboard
  • Make Picks
  • Consensus Picks
  • Team Predictions
  • Head-to-Head
  • Game Briefing

Picks by Sport

  • NFL Picks
  • NCAAF Picks
  • NBA Picks
  • NCAAB Picks
  • MLB Picks
  • NHL Picks

About SportsJaw

  • How It Works
  • SJ Coins
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Contact Us

21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Picks are opinions, not guarantees. Past results do not predict future outcomes.

© 2026 SportsJaw. For entertainment purposes only. SportsJaw does not accept or place wagers.

NCAAF picks›Cincinnati Bearcats vs Tulane Green Wave history

Cincinnati Bearcats versus Tulane Green Wave Head-to-head history

Scores, recaps and recorded betting results from the five most recent meetings in SportsJaw history.

SportsJaw’s stored game records date back to 2015. The news feed shows up to the five most recent completed meetings.

Head-to-head history

Last five meetings

Recent game recaps, recorded odds and betting results

Nov 25, 2022ScoreMoneylineSpreadGame total
Tulane Green WaveTULANE27-110 W-1 (-110) W
O 44 (-110) W
U 44 (-110) L
Cincinnati BearcatsCINCIN24-105 L+1 (-110) L

Tulane Green Wave defeated Cincinnati Bearcats 27-24

Team1234T
Tulane Green Wave3107727
Cincinnati Bearcats0107724
Oct 30, 2021ScoreMoneylineSpreadGame total
Cincinnati BearcatsCINCIN31-4000 W-28 (-110) L
O 61.5 (-110) L
U 61.5 (-110) W
Tulane Green WaveTULANE12+1550 L+28 (-110) W

Cincinnati Bearcats defeated Tulane Green Wave 31-12

Team1234T
Cincinnati Bearcats7771031
Tulane Green Wave0120012
Verified performance

Experts who know these teams

Weighted grade based on 75% profit from head-to-head bets and 25% from profits earned betting on either team.

1Rcobbett22Weighted grade41+$232 · 4 picks3–1 W–L · 75.0%2XyoojsterWeighted grade34+$1,158 · 3 picks3–0 W–L · 100.0%3Reno247Weighted grade31+$500 · 1 picks1–0 W–L · 100.0%
RankHandicapperGradeProfit
4Destiny091–1 W–L · 50.0%28-$105Ironcladlocks1–0 W–L · 100.0%25+$455611884602071–0 W–L · 100.0%22+$5007Oddsshark1–2 W–L · 33.3%22-$1108Gustavosinto1–0 W–L · 100.0%20+$2279Captainobvious1–1 W–L · 50.0%20-$1010Covers0–2 W–L · 0.0%20-$21011Mackintosh1–0 W–L · 100.0%17+$45512Emc0–1 W–L · 0.0%16-$25013Jeffjackson0–1 W–L · 0.0%14-$11014Coolio0–2 W–L · 0.0%14-$20015Badman0–1 W–L · 0.0%11-$50016Fisher490–1 W–L · 0.0%10-$25017Mr_Biggs0–1 W–L · 0.0%10-$50018Desert_Dude1–0 W–L · 100.0%8+$45519Drfeelgood0–1 W–L · 0.0%8-$5502016930207490–1 W–L · 0.0%6-$275

Expert grades weight verified head-to-head profit at 75% and profit on other games involving either team at 25%, with a confidence adjustment until ten qualifying picks are recorded.