| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wake Forest Demon DeaconsWAKE | 38 | -768 W | -17 (-110) W | O 62.75 (-110) L U 62.75 (-110) W |
| Rutgers Scarlet KnightsRUTGER | 10 | +560 L | +17 (-110) L |
Wake Forest Demon Deacons defeated Rutgers Scarlet Knights 38-10
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 |
|---|
Scores, recaps and recorded betting results from the five most recent meetings in SportsJaw history.
SportsJaw’s stored game records date back to 2015. The news feed shows up to the five most recent completed meetings.
Recent game recaps, recorded odds and betting results
| Score | Moneyline | Spread | Game total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wake Forest Demon DeaconsWAKE | 38 | -768 W | -17 (-110) W | O 62.75 (-110) L U 62.75 (-110) W |
| Rutgers Scarlet KnightsRUTGER | 10 | +560 L | +17 (-110) L |
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 |
|---|
| 4 |
|---|
| T |
|---|
| Wake Forest Demon Deacons | 14 | 6 | 3 | 15 | 38 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rutgers Scarlet Knights | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
Weighted grade based on 75% profit from head-to-head bets and 25% from profits earned betting on either team.
JamescashiolaWeighted grade39+$682 · 2 picks2–0 W–L · 100.0%2
SfdanWeighted grade33+$545 · 2 picks2–0 W–L · 100.0%3Expert grades weight verified head-to-head profit at 75% and profit on other games involving either team at 25%, with a confidence adjustment until ten qualifying picks are recorded.